 | | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital. —Matthew Miller
|
| | | (...) Macro. :) I'd agree -- this is an important feature. It's also good to get a model that can take good shots in low light without the flash, because lego and flash don't mix well. If it's for online stuff, resolution isn't the most important (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital. —Randy Williams
|
| | | | | im looking for a good digital.. any nice ones under $200? (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital. —Marc Cook
|
| | | | | (...) Thank you Matthew! Yes I used a 3 point light system. Basically a back light (a light angled to luminate the model from the rear -- this seems useless but it really helps the edges of a model stand out. Next the primary light (a direct light (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital. —David Goeb
|
| | | | | | | (...) [snip] (...) I have found that Mirrors work much 'cooler'. I have three large(5") Makeup-Mirrors with magnify side and regular. Plus a whole bag of small single side 2" Mirrors on stands. Works great as you can place them around the Model and (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital. —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | | (...) Yeah, I still have to get one. The Nikon cameras have a nice feature where you hold down the shutter and it takes approx 10 pictures in quick succession and keeps only the clearest. This works amazingly well -- I've gotten clear shots with 1/2 (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital. —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Maybe that's my problem with low-light situations! (...) That's awesome! Wow. --Todd (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital. —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) I'll second that! For doing close-up LEGO photos, it might even be the most important feature you need. (...) I'll second that too! My camera[1] takes great close-up pictures with the macro, but only if there's *copious* amounts of natural (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital. —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Urp, re-reading what I wrote above, it doesn't sound like praise for the camera. Actually, in the cases that I'm not 100% satisfied with its quality, I'm usually about 90% to 95% satisfied with it. Drooling over some of the Nikon pix I've (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital. —Marc Cook
|
| | | | | (...) Nice photo's btw. Mirrors huh? Never though of that. Not sure I have any that will work. Your pictures are crystal clear. Well here's where bleaching (too much light) came out pretty cool... The Lego Seal team in the helicopter bay coming home (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital. —David Goeb
|
| | | | | | (...) [snip] (...) Yeah, I like the shot alot. I picked up my 2" mirrors at a Dollar Shop for 1$(can) each and 5$(can) for the 5"ers. Quick follow up note on the Macro issue; Take several Shots moving the Center Point for the AutoFocus each Time. I (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital. —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) You know, the 950 has a $100 rebate through the end of June. :) (24 years ago, 27-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
