To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.publishOpen lugnet.publish in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Publishing / 1007
1006  |  1008
Subject: 
Re: Why are SSIs bad?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish
Followup-To: 
lugnet.publish
Date: 
Fri, 1 Oct 1999 09:39:59 GMT
Viewed: 
55 times
  
[ FUT lugnet.publish ]

Matthew:

[...]

be stored by proxies. Is it possible to make server-side
processed pages appear as static pages when they are served?

Yes, you can configure your web server this way.

Would you care to give a lazy web site manager a hint for
doing this with Apache?

Play well,

Jacob

      ------------------------------------------------
      --  E-mail:        sparre@cats.nbi.dk         --
      --  Web...:  <URL:http://www.ldraw.org/FAQ/>  --
      ------------------------------------------------



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Why are SSIs bad?
 
(...) Check in your httpd.conf for this: # CacheNegotiatedDocs: By default, Apache sends Pragma: no-cache with each # document that was negotiated on the basis of content. This asks proxy # servers not to cache the document. Uncommenting the (...) (25 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.publish)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Why are SSIs bad?
 
(...) If you're the site admin, there's not a security problem. The security issue is with letting your _users_ use SSI, because those commands execute as the user which owns the web server. Which, if you don't trust your users, is a bad thing. (...) (25 years ago, 30-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)

8 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR