Subject:
|
Re: Why are SSIs bad?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Fri, 1 Oct 1999 12:36:42 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@ANTISPAMmattdm.org
|
Viewed:
|
496 times
|
| |
|
|
Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@sys-323.risoe.dk> wrote:
> Would you care to give a lazy web site manager a hint for
> doing this with Apache?
Check in your httpd.conf for this:
# CacheNegotiatedDocs: By default, Apache sends Pragma: no-cache with each
# document that was negotiated on the basis of content. This asks proxy
# servers not to cache the document. Uncommenting the following line
# disables this behavior, and proxies will be allowed to cache the
# documents.
#CacheNegotiatedDocs
Which I think should do it. It may also be a good idea, if performance isn't
a gigantic concern, to make Apache check all .html files for SSI instead of
just .shtml (if you're doing SSI on all your pages, that won't make a speed
difference anyway) because it's possible (although stupid if true) that some
browsers/proxies make their caching decisions based on file extension.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why are SSIs bad?
|
| Matthew: (...) Hmm? This sounds more like it is related to content negotiation, which among other things is used to deliver documents in a language the reader understands. Does it mean that proxy servers don't know about content negotiation? (...) (...) (25 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why are SSIs bad?
|
| [ FUT lugnet.publish ] Matthew: [...] (...) Would you care to give a lazy web site manager a hint for doing this with Apache? Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
