Subject:
|
Re: Why are SSIs bad?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Fri, 1 Oct 1999 18:58:52 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm*antispam*.org
|
Viewed:
|
764 times
|
| |
|
|
Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@sys-323.risoe.dk> wrote:
> This sounds more like it is related to content negotiation,
> which among other things is used to deliver documents in a
> language the reader understands.
Actually, I think you're right. Sorry -- too early in the morning. Or late
at night. Whenever it was when I wrote that. Disregard what I said. :)
I just tested, and it looks to me like Apache isn't setting "Pragma:
no-cache". So I think what you want to do is set the expires header to
something in the future, using mod_expires.
> Checking out the documentation, it is more likely that "mod_expires"[1] is
> the solution, if you want proxies to cache server side processed pages.
Yeah, like that. This is why I should read entire messages before starting
to reply. :)
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Why are SSIs bad?
|
| Matthew: (...) Hmm? This sounds more like it is related to content negotiation, which among other things is used to deliver documents in a language the reader understands. Does it mean that proxy servers don't know about content negotiation? (...) (...) (25 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
