 | | Re: Universal Star Command Site Updated
|
|
(...) Hollee shmokes....the organization that has gone into your continuity is phenomenal Dan. That is what I call a well established continuity. It's interesting as well how you've woven your own histories into community lines, (Legowars (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Universal Star Command Site Updated
|
|
Greetings! I'd like to make public an announcement that my website has recieved a much-needed update. The Universal Star Command website has recieved a few models, a news update, and misc. page updates. Please visit (URL) here.> Thanks, and good (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New vs. Old
|
|
(...) Head...spinning...gaaaa ok, fine. :P Play Well ~T (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New vs. Old
|
|
XFUT .publish (...) I wasn't really going after sigs in particular...I was more concerned with things like: (*fffffffssjjsshshsh...hhtttttt*) which show up as an even bigger mess: (*fffffffssjjsshshsh...hhtttttt*) when you're reading in plain text, (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Natural Lighting
|
|
(...) Sounds good. I'll try it out. Good thing shadows are useful, 'cause my driveway is boardered by trees and there's only a small amount of light in the center. (...) Yeah. I guess I'll have to deal with it tommorow when I take pictures of my new (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish.photography, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Natural Lighting
|
|
(...) Try taking your pictures in the shade or on overcast days. Even in the shade, it's still far brighter outdoors than it is inside, so you'll still get good results, without the stark shadows. I have a hard time getting good backgrounds for (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish.photography, FTX)
|
| |
| | FTX table questions...
|
|
Todd, Is there anyway to get some of the fancier FTX features to work inside an FTX table? For example, can I put a list or a section heading inside a table? This just makes my list disappear: ~ my table cell + one + two + three ie my table cell one (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Natural Lighting
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) hey john. not that i'm all that good in either photography or lego photography, but i do know that time of day has everything to do with shadow effects. usually, early in the morning or late in the day gives the "best" soft (...) (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish.photography, FTX)
|
| |
| | Natural Lighting
|
|
Hello, all. I've been experimenting with natural lighting today in the bright Florida sun. I've got very good results, much better then with artificial lighting. (9 URLs) Pictures are also easy to edit. (URL) I have two questions for you'all. (...) (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish.photography, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Testing with pictures
|
|
(...) (URL) Dan Boger dan@peeron.com (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Testing with pictures
|
|
Moved to .publishing... (...) You have to get a reasonably decent image-editing program. Plain 'ol paint doesn't cut it, and neither will most of the included microsoft 'imaging' software. You might be able to add simple text, but not much else. (...) (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
It is summer time, not lego time (= winter time), so I haven't felt this before now. I haven't seen this in my newsreader, but I can imagine that it might look really funny/odd. But leaving that of, here is my first suggestion: I will only post (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Mo'betta Mo'betta pics of on biomechanicalbricks.com
|
|
Mo'betta pics of me, the Jamocklaquat, and the Little Bots Series. All New Photography! Please have a look. (URL) Brighter Jama Picture:> (URL) 7 Little Sort Bots:> (2 URLs) me:> More goodies soon. e <www.biomechanicalbricks.com> (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: // and ** vs {} and [] (was: testing in rtl...)
|
|
(...) I see. With extensive modifications, I assume? I'm sure there's a way to link libperl.so to CNews but that could be unweildy to say the least. (...) Sorry I can't view the FTX results of that on my browser. But I assume that's right. (...) I (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Disabling HTML form button if any changes made to an edit box?
|
|
(...) Well, I assumed it was already 2 forms until I looked at the actual HTML. To me the horizontal rule between the 2 sections delineated the forms. If others assert they would be confused by 2 forms in this fashion what can I say? Perhaps there (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: Disabling HTML form button if any changes made to an edit box?
|
|
(...) Maybe that's what they intend to do. They may start to edit the message and then change their mind. If you are doing JS or CRC to check for changes in the edit box then you also need a way to reset it if edits are started and then decided (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: // and ** vs {} and [] (was: testing in rtl...)
|
|
(...) CNews. (...) Doesn't that look a bit redundant? /italics/ and *boldface* What do underlined underlines look like? Like this?-- _N_ew _E_ngland _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup Not sure how either any of those are an improvement. --Todd (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Disabling HTML form button if any changes made to an edit box?
|
|
(...) Yes, you don't want to use the browser's Back button. But you can easily add an "Edit" button to the preview page, which takes you back to an edit page with the changes intact. (...) Yes, and Mozilla doesn't preserve the contents of each frame (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: Disabling HTML form button if any changes made to an edit box?
|
|
(...) I agree with Dan...especially in light of how it's always been (a single form). (...) I'm not sure. Can you point me to specific examples of "bad wrapping in the quoted text"? One thing that I am aware of, however, is a -lack- of wrapping long (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: // and ** vs {} and [] (was: testing in rtl...)
|
|
(...) What NNTP server do you use? I was under the impression that it was written in Perl itself. [...] (...) How about a different interpretation - // and ** (and don't forget __ for underlining) might not be interpreted the same as the {} and [] (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
