 | | Re: Picture size
|
|
(...) Anything in excess of 640x480 is too big for most users. Screen size is not the only issue - consider also bandwidth. The file size grows exponentially as an image grows. (Twice the width = 4 times the size, 3x width = 9x size, etc.) (...) (23 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Picture size
|
|
(...) Agree, agree, agree, and agree. Just thought I'd put in that the only other concievable reason I could think of for pictures in excess of 800x600 would be for printing/photoediting purposes. But since that only occurrs once in a blue moon (IE (...) (23 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Picture size
|
|
(...) I go for 800x600 or smaller generally. Sometimes a large picture is worthwhile, but if you are including the pictures in-line in a website, you might want to have a smaller picture with a link to the big one. Cropping is one of the best ways (...) (23 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Picture size
|
|
(...) I typically do 640x480 or smaller, with a fairly heavy jpeg compression (usually 30 to 50%) so my images fall in the 30-60K range. I prefer to keep them a little smaller and sacrifice a little bit of quality, then have them over 80K and chew (...) (23 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Picture size
|
|
(...) I think you can show good detail with an image of 80 to 120 KB, but it depends on the picture. Some look better/worse than others. On my website, I limit my big, detailed pics to 120 KB max. That's just my preference. TJ p.s. I use dial-up :-( (...) (23 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Picture size
|
|
What do you think is a good balace between file size (speed) and largest display (detail) of a jpeg photo on a website? Jude (23 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | MichLUG Logo Contest
|
|
For some time we have been using a MichLUG logo (1) that has been sort of a placeholder until we can up with something better. Now is that time. We want a new, nice logo that will look great on a shirt. Something that will hold its own against the (...) (23 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.org.us.michlug, lugnet.org, lugnet.publish.html) !!
|
| |
| | AdeLUG's Website Update !!!
|
|
Hi all It's been a year, but finally the AdeLUG's website has been fixed up & updated. It will soon have the write up for AdeLUG's #5 which was sucsessfully held yesterday. (URL) free to point out any bugs/broken links. Carl -- Member #1165 (URL) (...) (23 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.loc.au.sa.ade, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: All your Microscale Moonbase are belong to Us.
|
|
(...) Hey! WOW! Thanks, Bill! I didn't know you could do that! I'll try to do it from now on, though, with the most representative pic for a sneak peek. I appreciate the helpful hint, and may wander over toward .publish to browse for other good (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: All your Microscale Moonbase are belong to Us.
|
|
(...) What he means is posting a link to the image on Brickshelf which can be viewed even before it is moderated. To do this, go to the page for the image (not the thumbnail/folder page) and right-click on the large image. Choose "Copy Image (...) (23 years ago, 1-Nov-02, to lugnet.loc.se, lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
|
