Subject:
|
Re: Picture size
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Thu, 14 Nov 2002 23:06:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3942 times
|
| |
|
|
"David Eaton" <deaton@intdata.com> writes:
> In lugnet.publish, Frank Filz writes:
> > > What do you think is a good balace between file size (speed) and largest
> > > display (detail) of a jpeg photo on a website?
> >
> > A picture much larger than 800x600 is also generally wasted because few
> > people run at higher than 1024x768 resolution. A 1024x768 picture is
> > acceptable if the detail warrants it. Much larger and you're down to a
> > tiny handful who will not have to scroll to see your image.
>
> Agree, agree, agree, and agree. Just thought I'd put in that the only other
> concievable reason I could think of for pictures in excess of 800x600 would
> be for printing/photoediting purposes. But since that only occurrs once in a
> blue moon (IE usually your target audience for something like this is one or
> two people), I'd advise against doing it...
Anything in excess of 640x480 is too big for most users. Screen size
is not the only issue - consider also bandwidth. The file size grows
exponentially as an image grows. (Twice the width = 4 times the size,
3x width = 9x size, etc.)
Thumbnails should link to something no bigger than 640x480. If you
want to have a larger version available, have the 640x480 link to
that.
All is IMNSHO... :-)
--Bill.
--
William R Ward bill@wards.net http://www.wards.net/~bill/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistency is not really a human trait.
--Maude (from the film "Harold & Maude")
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Picture size
|
| (...) Agree, agree, agree, and agree. Just thought I'd put in that the only other concievable reason I could think of for pictures in excess of 800x600 would be for printing/photoediting purposes. But since that only occurrs once in a blue moon (IE (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
