Subject:
|
Re: Picture size
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:33:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1054 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.publish, Jude Beaudin writes:
> What do you think is a good balace between file size (speed) and largest
> display (detail) of a jpeg photo on a website?
I think you can show good detail with an image of 80 to 120 KB, but it
depends on the picture. Some look better/worse than others.
On my website, I limit my big, detailed pics to 120 KB max. That's just my
preference.
TJ
p.s. I use dial-up :-( but I can tolerate an 80 KB pic alright.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Picture size
|
| What do you think is a good balace between file size (speed) and largest display (detail) of a jpeg photo on a website? Jude (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
