Subject:
|
Re: Picture size
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Wed, 13 Nov 2002 16:00:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1163 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.publish, Jude Beaudin writes:
> What do you think is a good balace between file size (speed) and largest
> display (detail) of a jpeg photo on a website?
>
> Jude
I typically do 640x480 or smaller, with a fairly heavy jpeg compression
(usually 30 to 50%) so my images fall in the 30-60K range. I prefer to keep
them a little smaller and sacrifice a little bit of quality, then have them
over 80K and chew up bandwidth. Not that I really have to worry about
bandwidth since I'm on DSL, but I try to be kind to brickshelf :)
Adrian
--
www.brickfrenzy.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Picture size
|
| What do you think is a good balace between file size (speed) and largest display (detail) of a jpeg photo on a website? Jude (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
