 | | Re: lowering noise —Timothy Gould
|
| | | (...) I find this interesting. I obviously have a different opinion of what constitutes flaming. Calling people "lackeys" seems like flaming to me. As does comparing them to "Baghdad Bob". Could you explain to me why this is not flaming? On a (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: lowering noise —Kelly McKiernan
|
| | | | | (...) I won't speak for Mark, as I know he's perfectly capable of speaking clearly for himself. The question originally posed by Frank was echoed by Mark, and I find myself wondering the same thing. I think you and I are having two separate (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: lowering noise —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | | (...) I don't find myself wondering it because, as I have said, perceptions of trolling etc. are dependent on personal perception whereas Eric's original breach was not. It is the same for where one directs posts (marketplace ads being a specific (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: lowering noise —Maggie Cambron
|
| | | | (...) No, I agree with you that he should not have said "Baghdad Bob" and that it serves no good purpose to call someone a lackey. But of *all* the instances of provocation that have occurred over the years on Lugnet I would say this is very minor, (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: lowering noise —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | --SNIP-- (...) I wouldn't. I would find it very offensive to be called a lackey after telling someone off for something very rude (hijacking a singles ad post to make an argument). (...) You have derided the same things as Mark and now defend him, (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| | | | |
