 | | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
Interesting how you presume to talk on his behalf… And all the others who posted… Anyway… (...) That's all well and good. For you can e-mail him as much as you want, you can leave as many happy-goodbye messages in the .peoples section as you wish, (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
(...) As someone who HAS taken a break I can say that it can be quite a good thing, in that it recharges your batteries a bit. It can also remind you that LUGNET is more than just one person, even yourself, because the discussion goes on without you (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
I hope that is all it is, I would rather he just take a break than sour over time. (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
(...) Definitely. What is happening to Lugnet anyway? (...) Hmm...The community should really think about this. What exactly Is Lugnet and why was it instated? I'll tell you. Lugnet is the medium for Lego fans like you and me to discuss matters (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | RE: On Hiatus
|
|
(...) IMO, the problem is that people seem to think the noise is more important than the content. To me, the content on LUGNET is the MOCs and the related building discussion. Noise is people bickering about why they can't get along...which leads to (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
(...) Jim, I know Tim well enough to say that it is not the name change that brought him to this decision, it was just the last straw of a long complex chain of events. It isn't that he can't handle negativity or criticism. It is that over a long (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
If this is about the name change , it is best that you do take a break. While I feel it was a little out of line for you to ask,(if that indeed is what this is all about) you did it in the nicest possible way. It also got blown out of proportion by (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
I'll admit I'm feeling like some others here do. Tim has always played an important role here on Lugnet but, a partial quote, "Lugnet is a somewhat compartamentalized RTL". There are still times when I find it worth posting something (like the (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
(...) I think it is a case of why he is leaving that got it highlighted not so much that he is leaving. Tim was a great advocate for LUGNET and it is very disturbing that he feels he has to walk away for a while. (...) It does to some of us who have (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
What a waste. To highlight a post about someone's hiatus?!? He said he’d be back… Anyway, like it matterz Can we stick to more relevant topics for highlighting in the future? . .. ... .... ..... ...... ....... ........ Spydèr ........ ...... ..... (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) <Snip> (...) I agree that something needs to be done. Lately it seems like LUGNET is a somewhat compartmentalized RTL. As much as some people try, the noise still gets the visibility. I feel like I know quite a few people here, (...) (24 years ago, 8-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
(...) Me, too :-( I'm gonna go chew on some shoe leather now... Amy (24 years ago, 8-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
Tim, although i don't know you that well i will be sorry to see you go. I do see how much you do for the Lego community, and I see your passion for the Brick... Please reconsider you decision :-))) I have also seen how many people get caught up in (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
(...) Whoa! I'm sorry to hear that you're leaving LUGNET. Personally, I myself have comtemplated leaving before, and usually, I am on leave anyway cuz I'm so busy working on my story (I completely changed the story, so it doesn't suck anymore). It's (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | On Hiatus
|
|
Hi everyone - I just thought I'd post to say that I am leaving LUGNET for a while. I never understood why people leave this place to take breathers until this week, but believe me when I say I need a BIG one. The problems, the garbage here is just (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.trains.org.niltc) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Shiri, the girl who is older than me
|
|
(...) Heh, well, I can't really disagree. Dag-nabbit! ;-) -Shiri, who hopes to stay a kid at heart (24 years ago, 6-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Shiri, the girl who is older than me
|
|
(...) I always tell the non-AFOL that the 6-12 age indicators are times in between you are allowed to build the set. So the averag Miniland set can be build between 6 am and 12 midnight ;-) Mark -stop the clock! I can't find this piece- de Kock (24 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Shiri, the girl who is older than me
|
|
I may not be a teenager...but I still love my Lego! The only advantage to age and a college degree is that it pays more money---so I can buy more Lego! The most important thing is to remain a kid at heart....especially since I've gotten out of my (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Shiri, the girl who is older than me
|
|
"Bram Lambrecht" <bram@cwru.edu> wrote in message news:000001c1c063$04...1681@bl... (...) And I am a teenager no longer, as of yesterday. Shiri, you should have known that, I even *called* you last night/this morning your time. :P And Bram, now I (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Shiri, the girl who is older than me
|
|
(...) Lego for kids? What a bizarre idea! Steve (24 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.people)
|
