 | | Re: Shiri - A one time thing?
|
|
(...) learn (...) I doubt it. You've shown no ability to think, consider, or learn from anyone about this issue. Like Jeremy, I have an extremely low opinion of NELUG, and that will change only when I've seen evidence of an ability to PLAY WELL with (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Shiri - A one time thing?
|
|
(...) You should- it was sarcasm, meant to point out that your statement was neither thoughtful nor necessary. (...) You are confusing the fact that I haven't seen a reason to change my opinion with the above. (...) Which you are entitled to. But (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Shiri - A one time thing?
|
|
(...) Why is this being reopened again? NELUG has chosen to make rules the way they see fit, a democratic process validated those rules and I think it's rather immature of YOU to buck against a club somewhere else and the way they organize. I have a (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Shiri - A one time thing?
|
|
(...) I think it comes up again because most of us outsiders are just aghast that Shiri isn't already some kind of honored and permanent fixture of the NELUG clubhouse. May I recommend using crazy glue on her sneekers...? =oP -- Hop-Frog (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Shiri - A one time thing?
|
|
(...) I think it also comes up because AFAIK, they're the only club that has any kind of membership restriction, and it is very baffling to many of us why it would exist. *BUT* again, it's their policy, and their choice. I can respect their opinion (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Shiri - A one time thing?
|
|
(...) Which is *almost* exactly what I was asking for. The only reason that's not *exactly* what I asked for is because I already tried... (URL) the fact is that fewer people read .ma.bos than .org.us.nelug. I got no replies there, and only two by (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.people)
|
