 | | Re: Progress on Ore Dock —Kai Brodersen
|
| | | snip> (...) Never doubted you for a sec ;) (...) I stand corrupted :) (...) I was working on a 16 ore car, it would look good either way, whatever design has the most obtainable parts. (...) GO right ahead, I have too much work with the ore dock, (...) (23 years ago, 17-Sep-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Progress on Ore Dock —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Mebbe. Fait accompli may be better though. PS, (to all) don't EVER walk out on an ore dock, it is a terminally stupid think to do. Very dangerous. ++Lar (23 years ago, 17-Sep-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Progress on Ore Dock —Kai Brodersen
|
| | | | | Say whaaa? (...) (23 years ago, 17-Sep-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Progress on Ore Dock —Kai Brodersen
|
| | | | | YAY i got more tubes now i can build bigger! (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Progress on Ore Dock —Kai Brodersen
|
| | | | | here’s the progress: (URL) two pics on the right are the newest. I extended the dock about 64 studs, and finished the superstructure for the supports. All i need to do now is to expand it on the sides, and possibly lengthen it 64 more studs to fill (...) (23 years ago, 20-Sep-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Progress on Ore Dock —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Well, a Jenny will likely have 2 dump bay openings. Assume they'll have a tie spacing between them. We just need to try to nail down the length we want to use. I haven't had time to do a design yet. (...) I'd advocate squeezing out a stud if (...) (23 years ago, 21-Sep-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Progress on Ore Dock —Jason Spears
|
| | | | | | (...) I would have to say that a single track running out on the dock would be sufficent. If you have your heart set on two tracks then by all means don't let me stop you. But keep in mind how you are going to attach the track on the dock to the (...) (23 years ago, 21-Sep-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Progress on Ore Dock —Kai Brodersen
|
| | | | | | What I can do to save my insanity is too widen the structure. Instead of 10 I will make it 20 so I will be able to fit 2 tracks in it. This will also allow for the big containers that go under the track that contain ore and direct it to the chutes. (...) (23 years ago, 21-Sep-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Progress on Ore Dock —Kai Brodersen
|
| | | | (...) I dont know if you misspelled anything or I dont latin, but what does Fait accopli mean? As to the subject of posting in .trains I think I might be able to get some more help on this subject. (23 years ago, 21-Sep-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Progress on Ore Dock —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Fait accompli means "It's accomplished" or something similar. It means presenting the final result rather than intermediate steps. But I may well have been wrong and crossposting to .trains may well bring some other ideas in to bear. (...) (...) (23 years ago, 21-Sep-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| | | | |
