 | | Re: 3T Board Change Suggestion
|
|
(...) It's a good point. For one thing, for anybody who wants to use a light sensor to "look" at the cells, the bottom would have to be a standard color. And on top of that, each board would require nine 1x1 ties of the chosen color. Tough. (...) (...) (19 years ago, 9-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T Board Change Suggestion
|
|
UNCLE - I give up - okay already - now I just want to kick all of your butts in the competition :) Just because I didn't show up on January 2nd... I see how you are :) (...) Just goes to show that there was an error in the board design. If the board (...) (19 years ago, 9-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T Board Change Suggestion
|
|
In lugnet.org.us.laflrc, Brian Davis wrote: -snip- (...) On the hardware side, the biggest change is that my cube magazine now moves side-to-side with the RCX/arm carriage assembly. The arm is still the only thing that moves out over the playing (...) (19 years ago, 9-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T Board Change Suggestion
|
|
(...) When does the robot need to be ready? Has a final date for competition been set yet? Bryan (19 years ago, 9-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T Board Change Suggestion
|
|
(...) It sounds like the carriage has become a castle. Is there still room for a minifig guard on the fortress wall :) ? (...) I hear you. Next time if we really need color distinguishablility, we test first. (...) so... you still used the same (...) (19 years ago, 9-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T Board Change Suggestion
|
|
(...) We need to remind Kerby to also vote "no"... :) (...) Not a problem. We understand why you made the decision. :) (...) And, you know, also. (...) Much better. Now the robot will only lose 1 in 10, instead of 1 in 2... :) We've been talking (...) (19 years ago, 9-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T Board Change Suggestion
|
|
(...) Fair enough. As it stands right now, my robot is best suited to entertaining the kids while the "real" competitors fight it out :-). (...) True: and if we had used 3x3 cubes, I could have fit it in a smaller package :-). Personally, I wouldn't (...) (19 years ago, 9-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T Board Change Suggestion
|
|
I still might construct a 6x6 cell version of the board for use with kids (if my robot is easily adaptable. This would probably improve my drop reliability to about 100%... I actually sat and played 23 games without modifying the robot last night. (...) (19 years ago, 10-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
