Subject:
|
Re: tic-tac-toe bots
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.laflrc
|
Date:
|
Fri, 4 Nov 2005 14:28:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7579 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, November 4, 2005 9:00 am, John Brost wrote:
> In lugnet.org.us.laflrc, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
>
> > Why does it need to be limited to a single RCX?
>
>
> It just seems like we would probably be handing 1st place (or the top few spots)
> to builders who had the time & resources to build 2 rcx robots or 2 separate
> robots.
I'm ok with that. :) But, of course, you guys know I'll spend the time & resources
to build such a robot.
> I'm not sure we should do this. Yes, most people who are likely to
> participate have the resources to field multiple-rcx entries. But not everybody
> could (or would want to). Do we want to "require" multiple RCX entries to be
> competitive?
I'm OK with that.
Anyone else?
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: tic-tac-toe bots
|
| (...) It just seems like we would probably be handing 1st place (or the top few spots) to builders who had the time & resources to build 2 rcx robots or 2 separate robots. I'm not sure we should do this. Yes, most people who are likely to (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
