Subject:
|
Re: tic-tac-toe bots
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.laflrc
|
Date:
|
Fri, 4 Nov 2005 14:00:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1010 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.us.laflrc, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> Why does it need to be limited to a single RCX?
>
> Of all the people who are likely to participate, can you think of any that are
> limited to one RCX?
>
> Also, it doesn't have to be "one" robot. You could make a robot that plays the game
> from one side of the board, and another that clears the board from an adjacent side.
>
> Anyone else have an opinion?
>
> Steve
It just seems like we would probably be handing 1st place (or the top few spots)
to builders who had the time & resources to build 2 rcx robots or 2 separate
robots. I'm not sure we should do this. Yes, most people who are likely to
participate have the resources to field multiple-rcx entries. But not everybody
could (or would want to). Do we want to "require" multiple RCX entries to be
competitive?
I don't know.
John
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: tic-tac-toe bots
|
| (...) I'm ok with that. :) But, of course, you guys know I'll spend the time & resources to build such a robot. (...) I'm OK with that. Anyone else? Steve (19 years ago, 4-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
| | | tic-tac-toe - Clearing the board
|
| Ok, let me pose this question. In our Tic-Tac-Toe game, Should we offer a time bonus (subtract some time) for a robot that can clear the board after the game is over? Assuming robots will play two games against each other robot, that means each (...) (19 years ago, 4-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: tic-tac-toe bots
|
| (...) Actually, planning for future events (like 3T) is also good. So, thanks. (...) ... (...) Why does it need to be limited to a single RCX? Of all the people who are likely to participate, can you think of any that are limited to one RCX? Also, (...) (19 years ago, 3-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
