 | | Re: tic-tac-toe - Clearing the board
|
|
(...) How exactly are we defining clearing, and are both robots going to be attempting such clearing at the same time? I have visions of the "clearing" phase being a place we can all apply our Sumo robots... Perhaps a "self-reseting" system should (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | tic-tac-toe - Clearing the board
|
|
Ok, let me pose this question. In our Tic-Tac-Toe game, Should we offer a time bonus (subtract some time) for a robot that can clear the board after the game is over? Assuming robots will play two games against each other robot, that means each (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: tic-tac-toe bots
|
|
(...) I'm ok with that. :) But, of course, you guys know I'll spend the time & resources to build such a robot. (...) I'm OK with that. Anyone else? Steve (21 years ago, 4-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: tic-tac-toe bots
|
|
(...) It just seems like we would probably be handing 1st place (or the top few spots) to builders who had the time & resources to build 2 rcx robots or 2 separate robots. I'm not sure we should do this. Yes, most people who are likely to (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Microscale "Honor Harrington"-style space warship
|
|
BrickShelf gallery includes ongoing prototypes and alternate sizes, but no reference images yet: (URL) David Weber is a prolific writer of mil-SF novels, including the dozen-volume (URL) "Honor Harrington" (HH) series> published (in the US) by Baen (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-05, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.build.microscale, lugnet.space, lugnet.org.us.delvalug, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: tic-tac-toe bots
|
|
Kerby accidentally sent this to me... On Thu, November 3, 2005 4:07 pm, Kerby Hughes wrote: I kind of have mixed views about this. (Keep in mind that I haven't actually tried to build anything for 3T yet) If I was trying to build a robot that could (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: tic-tac-toe bots
|
|
(...) To address the first point, take a look at the large number of solutions to the "Project X" challeng in the rtlToronto newsgroup. One of the first things I built as a new Mindstorms user was a Project X 'bot, *because* I was curious how to do (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: tic-tac-toe bots
|
|
(...) Actually, planning for future events (like 3T) is also good. So, thanks. (...) ... (...) Why does it need to be limited to a single RCX? Of all the people who are likely to participate, can you think of any that are limited to one RCX? Also, (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | tic-tac-toe bots
|
|
I know alot of you guys are focusing on Chibots right now but... So I actually felt like building last night and was thinking of tic-tac-toe. We had talked about awarding a time bonus to robots who could clear the board of their blocks after a game. (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: lots of stuff...
|
|
(...) Kevin, If you can regulate when the balls come through the machine, something like this would be very fun to watch. The cool part is making it "look" like it could fail at any time, but making it so it actually won't fail... At BrickFest, (...) (21 years ago, 2-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
