 | | Re: rtlToronto14 AC rule change?
|
|
(...) OK, i don't want to sound like one of those guys that digs for loop holes. Unlike SOME people who build self balancing robots.... BUT. ;) <--- sorry steve. if i lay on the ground 1 AC line. and some other robot just drives over it. AND DOES (...) (21 years ago, 29-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto14 AC rule change?
|
|
(...) The rule seems pretty clear. "...and any entanglement means immediate forfeit to the other player." if it doesn't get entanglemented, it's fine. :) Maybe I will build a robot for this event. It'll be called "The Entangler". It has a 36 inch (...) (21 years ago, 29-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto14 AC rule change?
|
|
(...) Quiet You! That's what I was planing to do. :-) Derek (21 years ago, 29-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto14 AC rule change?
|
|
(...) UH calum.... clearly by making a rule that will allow a robot to win by default, you have changed the nature of the game. ergo.... FIX IT!!!! (...) I still maintain that it was "worth it" smirk! Chris crane rhymes with train. (21 years ago, 29-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto14 AC rule change?
|
|
(...) I see a very easy fix to this problem. :-) Derek (21 years ago, 29-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto14 AC rule change?
|
|
(...) ya, don't let calum pretend to be a lawyer and make rules. -- Chris Why do solar calculators have an off button? (21 years ago, 29-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto14 AC rule change?
|
|
(...) So, you want to create more rules, to prevent some stratigies from working/being used? I don't think that's how it works. Maybe you should come up with a strategy to defeat "The Entangler" (...) hmm. Of course. no AC! :) If I must do (...) (21 years ago, 29-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto14 AC rule change?
|
|
(...) It IS intereresting that having the AC cord was put up for a vote, but the disqualification rule wasn't... :-) (...) Yes, but more importantly, why do they have an *on* button? Mark (okay, back to lurking...) (21 years ago, 29-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto14 AC rule change?
|
|
(...) The entanglement rule was pre-existing. The result of breaking that rule would be disqualification. Calum just wants to make it clear to the competitors what they risked by using AC. Derek (21 years ago, 29-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
