To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 510
509  |  511
Subject: 
Re: new game/rule help
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Tue, 13 Mar 2001 16:17:44 GMT
Viewed: 
496 times
  
Exactly what I was proposing, and would accept.  Connect em with a
space hose to start with.  I will even galdly stipulate the space
hose if you forgot to bring it.  Basically, I want all your bots
to start within a 2 foot square.  Heck, I mean, lots of robots I've
seen would break into 4 pieces if you picked them up wrong; why
should we hold the swarms to a higher standard? :D

Jeff


Calum Tsang wrote:

In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno writes:

to me this means you can build a "robot" that is really 2 or more bots
that each go about their thing.

Yes.

If someone is entering 4 robots as ONE player, should the robot have to
be one robot to start and break into 4 robots, OR should all the entered
robots just have to fit in the square??

I'd like it to be the break a part bot, but Calum says it makes it too
complex.

One thing I notice is a perverse requirement to make things mechanically
complex, when there are other strategic, programming or organizational
solutions which can solve problems in other ways.  It's sort of like the
difference between Cray supercomputers (complex, expensive and elegant) vs
MPP clusters (simple, cheap but ugly).

If you want to impose a requirement to make them all one unit, someone who
enters four bots will simply join them with a little Space hose.

Calum



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: new game/rule help
 
FINE, with much discussion off list I can begrudgingly accept non attached multiple robots. (...) Because the risk of a break-a-way bot NOT working levels the play field for the new comer who only has a single bot/ My consolation prize then would be (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: new game/rule help
 
(...) Yes. (...) One thing I notice is a perverse requirement to make things mechanically complex, when there are other strategic, programming or organizational solutions which can solve problems in other ways. It's sort of like the difference (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

12 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR