Subject:
|
Re: rtl12 Game Proposal
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Wed, 8 May 2002 03:34:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
597 times
|
| |
|
|
Whoops. Sorry about that content free post just now.
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno writes:
> If you decide to vend five dollar bills and only charge a buck, then
> your robot will collect the most audience dollars. and you win. BUT at
> what cost???
Could you impose price controls here to avoid that? Disallow selling things
for less than they cost? Require that all things cost less than a loon and
require people to take only loons?
> NOW, pretend you want to vend something gross, like small ducks, then
> there is a good chance even if you charge only a dime, as long as people
> don't want little ducks (eweeew) then you will not make as much money
> and you might not win.
Why are small ducks gross? What's not to like about baby ducklings? They're
less messy than monkeys. (with cymbals or not!)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: rtl12 Game Proposal
|
| (...) I don't think you've got the flavour of rtlToronto-it's not really that big of a deal. The aim of the vending machine game will really be more one of building the most complicated, elegant and impressive mechanism. The money part of it, well, (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: rtl12 Game Proposal
|
| (...) NO, and hear is why: If you decide to vend five dollar bills and only charge a buck, then your robot will collect the most audience dollars. and you win. BUT at what cost??? NOW, pretend you want to vend something gross, like small ducks, then (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
