To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 4367
4366  |  4368
Subject: 
Re: Sumo-Train Competition
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains
Followup-To: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Tue, 7 May 2002 21:47:46 GMT
Viewed: 
2516 times
  
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Benjamin Medinets writes:
> I was thinking this morning how cool it would be to have this kind of
> competition.
> 
> Imagine this:
> 
> RCX controlled train...3 cars, first car would have the train motor (train
> engine car), second car would have the RCX (coal car), and the third car
> would have the mechanism to knock off your buddy's/competitor's train off
> his/her tracks ("crane car")
> 
> Tracks would be generally parallel in a "large-size" double loop.
> The tracks would not be "powered" only by the power in the RCX.
> 
> Points would be 20 points for knocking off the engine or crane car.  30
> points (for increased difficulty, more tension and torque) for knocking off
> the coal car.
> 
> So how does this sound for a future competition.
> To me, it sounds like fun and generally not too complicated.

This sounds absolutely hilarious. One suggestion I would have might be to
have two crossovers so each competitor spent 1/2 of its time on the inside
of the "oval" and 1/2 on the outside. My suspicion is that the crane boom
swinging packs a lot more mo when swung outwards as you're rounding a curve
than it does when swung inwards.

Of course with two crossovers you then have to add collision avoidance

Unless you used flyovers/overpasses?

Maybe if they were on the same track power segment/loop you only need one
crossover or one flyover? But then the trains are not independently powered.
Would that be a problem?

Anyway this sounds like movies of it would be fun to watch.

Xposted to trains but FUT left to rtlToronto...



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Sumo-Train Competition
 
(...) One problem with a parallel double loop is that with only one curve radius, you don't get a real "parallel" curve. (...) A double figure 8 would easily get an "even" fight. You then start each train on the outside track of one of the lobes. I (...) (24 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
  Re: Sumo-Train Competition
 
(...) Pardon? Collision avoidance in a train sumo event.... Nahhhhhhh :) Perhaps collision detection - so you can accelerate... >:) Jeff E (24 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Message is in Reply To:
  Sumo-Train Competition
 
I was thinking this morning how cool it would be to have this kind of competition. Imagine this: RCX controlled train...3 cars, first car would have the train motor (train engine car), second car would have the RCX (coal car), and the third car (...) (24 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

10 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR