Subject:
|
Re: Sumo-Train Competition
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 May 2002 19:10:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
515 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> ANOTHER twist would be to allow (or require) distributed computing. That is,
> the track power is controlled by a stationary RCX on the ground (perhaps a
> 1.0 so it can get power from the wall) which the mobile RCX IR communicates
> with, sending speed/direction change commands to. This lets you use onboard
> batteries JUST to run the onboard RCX and actuators and you get all other
> power from the track (this of course requires "relay switches" where the RCX
> powers an actuator that throws the switch that controls the device).
An RCX isn't needed to control track power. Use the standard Lego controller
to set the speed. The onboard RCX controls a relay that is in between the
power pick-ups and the motor. This would require a modification to the
motor, though. But given that you are talking about bashing around your
bricks, modifying the motor shouldn't be too daunting <G>.
Another idea is for the trains to run in opposite directions. This would be
like jousting.
> > Mark <<
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Sumo-Train Competition
|
| (...) Well, yes, true. You're envisioning the train motor being directly controlled by the onboard RCX. Takes lots of batteries (which is a standard way to do things) However one interesting twist would be to have the train motor be UNCONTROLLED, (...) (22 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
