Subject:
|
Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Sun, 17 Feb 2002 21:42:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
599 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno writes:
> any ideas on how to improve accuracy when your accuracy is not
> repeatable????
I also have some problems with accuracy, but I am gona igonore it since there
is little I can do without a complete redesign. The thing has enough
momentum to push the whole 48x48 board around, there is little I can do in
software.
And don't concentrate on the anti-X pattern too much and forgot about the rest.
Make sure it can handle all other patterns effecently is also important.
The 4 rotation of each of these patterns are quite interesting:
1110
1010
1110
0000
1111
1111
0000
0000
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
| 1110 1010 1110 0000 humm, Ka-on, thank you for this pattern. here are a few that i use to test: 1111 1100 1000 1000 i called this on the stealth bomber. It forced a lot of diagonals for testing. As well, this is simple but a good test of distance (...) (22 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | some stuff... robot accuracy
|
| any ideas on how to improve accuracy when your accuracy is not repeatable???? Half the times the block is perfect but the other times it is always different, where do i look? its not like the inaccurate bloc is always in the same position the wrong (...) (22 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
