Subject:
|
Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Sun, 17 Feb 2002 19:05:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
522 times
|
| |
|
|
> There isn't an answer--if your accuracy isn't tight, it won't ever be
> repeatable unless you fix it somewhere else downstream of the system
this is what I thought.
argh.
Chris
Pretend this says something funny
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
| If it makes you feel any better, I've been struggling with the same thing myself. My ability to get the XY accuracy down to the top of a tooth IS slowing it down and worse, (like Calum said) it causes a vibration in the EOAT. I don’t have a time (...) (22 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
| (...) There isn't an answer--if your accuracy isn't tight, it won't ever be repeatable unless you fix it somewhere else downstream of the system (ie, a positioner chute like Derek's original idea for example) The block that is off its position is (...) (22 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
