Subject:
|
some stuff... robot accuracy
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Sun, 17 Feb 2002 18:09:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
877 times
|
| |
|
|
any ideas on how to improve accuracy when your accuracy is not
repeatable????
Half the times the block is perfect but the other times it is always
different, where do i look? its not like the inaccurate bloc is always
in the same position the wrong way.
Huh?
Chris
comments on Iain, and that funny "dance" machine withheld
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
| "Chris Magno" <cmagno@rogers.com> wrote in message news:3C6FF1BE.D77547...ers.com... (...) Use hard stops! Yay! Use five RCX's and have a hard stop for every position that the motor just slams it into. (...) Make it go slower, then it will be more (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
| (...) There isn't an answer--if your accuracy isn't tight, it won't ever be repeatable unless you fix it somewhere else downstream of the system (ie, a positioner chute like Derek's original idea for example) The block that is off its position is (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
| (...) I also have some problems with accuracy, but I am gona igonore it since there is little I can do without a complete redesign. The thing has enough momentum to push the whole 48x48 board around, there is little I can do in software. And don't (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
