Subject:
|
Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Sun, 17 Feb 2002 18:26:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
540 times
|
| |
|
|
> Make it go slower, then it will be more accurate.
>
>
ARE YOU NUTS!!!
slower is for Bruce. Speed is where it is at. I still need to shave
off 2 seconds to beat Ka-on.
:)
Chris
Pretend this says something funny
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
| "Chris Magno" <cmagno@rogers.com> wrote in message news:3C6FF5CB.ED778E...ers.com... (...) Yes...? (...) This is why we should not have been posting our times. Argh. Try your best to make it fast. You should decide for yourself how much shaving is (...) (22 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
| "Chris Magno" <cmagno@rogers.com> wrote in message news:3C6FF1BE.D77547...ers.com... (...) Use hard stops! Yay! Use five RCX's and have a hard stop for every position that the motor just slams it into. (...) Make it go slower, then it will be more (...) (22 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
