| |
On 5/27/06, Chris Magno wrote:
> In conversation, This was brought to my attention.
>
> ---snip----
>
> 2 thoughts
>
> these are JUST ideas.
>
> 1. in "real" tug of war, letting go of the rope is a forfeit, do we
> allow even temporary releasing the rope?
>
> There is SLIGHT advantage of releasing the rope in the hope that the
> opponent zooms off the edge with no one to hold him back.
Don't see why not. This could be a risky move, but could also be a
good strategy to break the grip or traction fo the opponent bot.
>
>
> 2. Do we want to allow bots to grasp/hook the end of the table to anchor?
Again, don't see why not, so long as it meets the start size/weight
and location.
>
> Could we make this game JUST about design, and wheel choice or loops holes?
>
> thoughts?
As always, I like to approach these contest as problem solving
exercises. A unique/radical/clever design, imo is worth exploring.
Otherwise we might as well just post instruction sets of a standard
chassis and force everyone to build the same thing.
p.s. is there a rule set posted yet?
-Rob A>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: TUG of WAR
|
| (...) Calum has this link, but its not "public" until we all agree on a rule set and date. (URL) from the FLOOD of people who replied to this post, I guess we are all happy with the rules a discussed. Chris (18 years ago, 29-May-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | TUG of WAR
|
| In conversation, This was brought to my attention. ---snip---- 2 thoughts these are JUST ideas. 1. in "real" tug of war, letting go of the rope is a forfeit, do we allow even temporary releasing the rope? There is SLIGHT advantage of releasing the (...) (18 years ago, 28-May-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
