Subject:
|
Re: It's the oddest thing...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:42:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
524 times
|
| |
|
|
"Calum Tsang" <tsangc@mie.utoronto.ca> wrote in message
news:IBGJ4u.13qG@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote:
> > It's the Apache process--the actual server still chugs along with nary an
> > issue--Apache just stops--yet there's no sign of said stoppage in Event
> > Viewer
> > or Task Manager
> So the task is still alive as far as NT is concerned, the OS is still
> running?
> That doesn't sound like hardware.
> so I'm thinking either Apache 2.xx doesn't like Win2K server edition, or
> the
> new
> > hardware works great for games, but not great as a server.
>
> No, I don't honestly think it's the hardware in this case. What's the
> memory usage like when you cold start the machine with Apache running then
> again when Apache breaks?
>
> Calum
Are there any clues in the Apache log?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: It's the oddest thing...
|
| (...) Nope--there are just no requests logged at a certain time, then I restart Apache and all the Apache startup requests are logged. I'm going to let it run for a few more days and see what happens--try to narrow it down Thanks to all for the (...) (20 years ago, 8-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: It's the oddest thing...
|
| (...) So the task is still alive as far as NT is concerned, the OS is still running? That doesn't sound like hardware. so I'm thinking either Apache 2.xx doesn't like Win2K server edition, or the new (...) No, I don't honestly think it's the (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
