| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys writes:
> are we also having another line, as shown in Calums, run through our layouts?
> my little vote is to have only the outside edge as a continous run because
> having a track 'cut thru' the center of my layout would make my switching
> yard verrry tiny.
The impression I got from Iain and JeffVW on group was that there was a
desire to run two rings, which I think is pretty nice too-it lets you have
two operators on a main line. The problem is where. The outer line yes,
everyone agrees on that, but the second line has to be at minimum the third
position to get the minimum radius. Play around with TD a little, that's
the conclusion I came to.
Calum
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: My Train2 Layout
|
| (...) I have put up a few tentative layouts at (URL) modified my switching yard a bit and may upload the latest image tonite, but basically i take the last switch and just curve it up to the top where it goes the edge at exactly 4 studs from the (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
