Subject:
|
Re: Ahem, onwards to rtl16, thank you
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:32:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1043 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Ka-On Lee wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote:
> > Well, an idea proposed is that we use the 4x4 playfield, have 2 ropes dangling
> > down within the perimeter, and have the ends of said ropes corresponding to the
> > starting square colours.
>
> I will just make Prog#1 look for white and Prog#2 look for black, hence save one
> sensor from looking at the square colour.
>
> > So that your 'bot has to find the right rope to climb
> >
> > This gets us out of a battery box only solution.
>
> Not really. What is stopping me from just aim a battery bot to run stright
> toward the correct rope?
Absolutely nothing, but it is one step more removed from a straight battery box
solution. Placing the end of the rope above the 'bot height is the first step,
then making your 'bot pick the rope with the same colour as the starting square.
If you can achieve both those things whilst using a straight battery box
solution--wow!
Dave K
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Ahem, onwards to rtl16, thank you
|
| (...) I will just make Prog#1 look for white and Prog#2 look for black, hence save one sensor from looking at the square colour. (...) Not really. What is stopping me from just aim a battery bot to run stright toward the correct rope? (21 years ago, 10-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
