Subject:
|
Re: Ahem, onwards to rtl16, thank you
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 21:20:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
529 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote:
> This gets us out of a battery box only solution.
Is there a reason to eliminate the battery box solutions?
I understand if RCX-less robots are allowed, Rob will show up with something
really cool, that flys up the rope, and wins the event, but doesn't have any
program.
What's wrong with that?
Robots that use mechanical logic can be very fun to watch. Isn't that the
point?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Ahem, onwards to rtl16, thank you
|
| (...) yes, and no. but more like no. (gadder 'roud chit-lins unc-y chris, gonna tells y'all's a story) rtlToronto was first created as a way to meet like minded lego enthusiasts in the Toronto area. this was a bit of a flop, and quickly turned into (...) (21 years ago, 9-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Ahem, onwards to rtl16, thank you
|
| In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang wrote: <snip> (...) Well, an idea proposed is that we use the 4x4 playfield, have 2 ropes dangling down within the perimeter, and have the ends of said ropes corresponding to the starting square colours. So (...) (21 years ago, 9-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
