| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> Ya, but why drag "innocent"(0) "bystanders"(0) into it? I mean if Steve's "all
> that"(0) (and I certainly get the impression at least one person (1) thinks so)
> you'd think he'd be showing off actual robots, (not guys standing around), to
> the admiring masses(2) that hang on his every word in this group.
>
> 0 - Quotes intentional and positioned for meaning
> 1 - Steve
> 2 - Two people is a "masses" right? Even if one of them is (1) ? I'm not sure
> who the other one is... maybe David K?
(0) I will apologize to any innocent bystanders, if I find any.
(1) Steve thinks he's lucky. A lot.
(2) As the filename indicates, that's Greg and John.
If you really want to see actual robots, come back next week.
I'll post some pictures of mine, also.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: C$ video
|
| (...) OR people could just SHOW UP the day of the contest. Chris There's no 'I' in 'team'. There's four in 'platitude-quoting idiot'. (23 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: C$ video
|
| (...) Ya, but why drag "innocent"(0) "bystanders"(0) into it? I mean if Steve's "all that"(0) (and I certainly get the impression at least one person (1) thinks so) you'd think he'd be showing off actual robots, (not guys standing around), to the (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
