|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Jennifer L. Boger wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Derek Raycraft wrote:
> > Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > > I was sort of hoping to see C$ robots in action. But instead this appears to be
> > > video of people watching robots, or something. At least the 2 I tried out of the
> > > first 3, anyway. The last one I get the same "file not found" error as others
> > > have reported.
> >
> > I think it's a plot by Steve to get us to waste our time trying to get
> > his videos to work rather then working on our own bots.
>
> Well duh!
Ya, but why drag "innocent"(0) "bystanders"(0) into it? I mean if Steve's "all
that"(0) (and I certainly get the impression at least one person (1) thinks so)
you'd think he'd be showing off actual robots, (not guys standing around), to
the admiring masses(2) that hang on his every word in this group.
0 - Quotes intentional and positioned for meaning
1 - Steve
2 - Two people is a "masses" right? Even if one of them is (1) ? I'm not sure
who the other one is... maybe David K?
++Lar (innocent bystander)
|
|
Message has 2 Replies: | | Re: C$ video
|
| In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Larry Pieniazek wrote: <snip> (...) I've always been an innocent bystander--why get involved in the affairs of others? just gives you heartache and a black eye. MYOB is my motto! Dave K -dave who? is there some guy named (...) (21 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | Re: C$ video
|
| (...) (0) I will apologize to any innocent bystanders, if I find any. (1) Steve thinks he's lucky. A lot. (2) As the filename indicates, that's Greg and John. If you really want to see actual robots, come back next week. I'll post some pictures of (...) (21 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
15 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|