 | | Re: i freeking hate rakes......
|
|
(...) dope-e dope dope-e dope. hey everybody, look at me.. I'm going to motorize the 8455 Backhoe. dope-e dope-e dope. WHAT THE HELL was I thinking? no, really? the pneumatics don't offer that kind of control. heck, if I could motorize the back hoe, (...) (21 years ago, 30-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: i freeking hate rakes......
|
|
(...) Ha! (...) Yup. But I'm pessimistic. :) (...) Phew. At least I'm not the only one who is finding out that 24" is HUGE. Iain (who doesn't have enough pieces) (21 years ago, 30-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | i freeking hate rakes......
|
|
OK, the sorter is done. I figure I'll work on the easy part. Brick extraction from the rice. AHHHHHHHhhh...hhh AHHHHHHHhhh...hhh AHHHHHHHhhh...hhh AHHHHHHHhhh...hhh AHHHHHHHhhh...hhh AHHHHHHHhhh...hhh AHHHHHHHhhh...hhh AHHHHHHHhhh...hhh (21 years ago, 30-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Almost piperacing
|
|
(...) you may be the king of acronyms, and phone stuff, but leave the film world to the "real" people. (me) have you not heard of the Micro dolly? weighs in at a mere 10lb (URL) have a list of "real" credits. Chris King (21 years ago, 29-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Almost piperacing
|
|
(...) Proper camera track is steel or aluminum, that's because the dolly is like a billion pounds to begin with, and once you've got the camera rig, DP/cameraman, videotap and preview monitor etc on it, like, two billion pounds. Calum (21 years ago, 29-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Almost piperacing
|
|
(...) this is VERY cool. BUT, in "film land" this is just a BIG camera dolly. (URL) is cool though. one of the "tricks" is to use house hold pledge on the tracks to make things faster. Chris (21 years ago, 29-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Almost piperacing
|
|
This one's from Iain: (URL) (21 years ago, 29-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto14 AC rule change?
|
|
(...) The entanglement rule was pre-existing. The result of breaking that rule would be disqualification. Calum just wants to make it clear to the competitors what they risked by using AC. Derek (21 years ago, 29-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto14 AC rule change?
|
|
(...) It IS intereresting that having the AC cord was put up for a vote, but the disqualification rule wasn't... :-) (...) Yes, but more importantly, why do they have an *on* button? Mark (okay, back to lurking...) (21 years ago, 29-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto14 AC rule change?
|
|
(...) We spend an inordinate amout of time discussing rules for situations that never happen. Nobody cheats. Plus, I've noticed over time that the rules that are followed during the actual contest are not exactly what was posted. Game day is usually (...) (21 years ago, 29-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
