 | | Re: Philosophical town question.
|
|
"ben medinets" <bmedinets@aol.com> wrote in message news:G9wqCB.M2@lugnet.com... (...) Are you coming to our next dinner?? It's this friday at Mels. Iain (24 years ago, 9-Mar-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Philosophical town question.
|
|
(...) Hey, Calum.... I like the "woodshed" approach myself....(without the back walls) for the reason it was designed there by Lego...it allows for increased play and easier access... While I feel a little awkward now about playing with a town (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Philosophical town question.
|
|
(...) rotflmao....(I think that's extrememly funny) the picture is cute but I'm still going with my apporach to buying basic sets 725 for some nice detailing (like the street lights, flowers, etc) For the smaller, "cheaper" houses in the town, Velux (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Philosophical town question.
|
|
Town is a style. You are right...and it is all about how much of your style you want to show. (...) it had a balcony, you could integrate a "fire escape" for it but stair would detract from the rest of the model. Benjamin Medinets (24 years ago, 9-Mar-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Philosophical town question.
|
|
(...) That just got me thinking-I saw this incredibly realistic bungalow from one of the Western Canada LUGs and it really impressed me, even if it's not the way I like building things, but the one thing I realized is that the floors wouldn't be to (...) (24 years ago, 8-Mar-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Philosophical town question.
|
|
(...) I've managed to include stairs in larger buildings, but the house presents a challenge. I used to use the "zap" "transporter" theory too. But there's this weird line one must draw in Lego Town. Town is not modelling, it's cartooning in the (...) (24 years ago, 8-Mar-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: thoughts on dragsters
|
|
(...) Strictly speaking, I wasn't so much asking as musing out loud. In doing so, I was probably proceeding from a false assumption... (snip) (...) This may be the false assumption. I got it in my head a while back that only input 2 could be used (...) (24 years ago, 8-Mar-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Philosophical town question.
|
|
"Calum Tsang" <tsangc@mie.utoronto.ca> wrote in message news:G9u0y4.Jq7@lugnet.com... (...) Crap. Now I have an urge to go build a cute little house. :) Iain (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Philosophical town question.
|
|
(...) I'm of the impression things need to be furnished, but it's really a question of time and pieces-I have some buildings without furnishings, and others completely furnished. I also have one building missing floors :) But as Ben mentioned, it (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Philosophical town question.
|
|
Very good question! One that a lot of us struggle with, no doubt. In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang writess: (...) I take it you are detailing the interior because if you weren't the question would be moot. I would say yes if you can afford (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
