 | | Re: rtl12 Game Proposal
|
|
(...) Because this Game in a "no Brainer" it would be possible to to just set up your vending machine and then walk away and look at other robots. So that we can have a more social event. The machine would be allowed to dispense ANYTHING you can (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto11 Event Rules Posted
|
|
we don't have to go to the three table idea if we (and i think I have) decide to start robots in the lower right side of your table. I'm just confused as to how to "score" against neither robot getting the flag. OR one cross but no flag, or....... (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Sumo-Train Competition
|
|
(...) This sounds absolutely hilarious. One suggestion I would have might be to have two crossovers so each competitor spent 1/2 of its time on the inside of the "oval" and 1/2 on the outside. My suspicion is that the crane boom swinging packs a lot (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto11 Event Rules Posted
|
|
(...) It was originally on carpet from three feet, IIRC. (...) You know, I like it too. Anyone seriously objecting to having three tables as Trevyn proposes? (...) Anyone up for overclocking your RCX? :) Calum (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto11 Event Rules Posted
|
|
Ok... I like the single RCX rule. (Although, I think if some builders want to use two RCX's, then let them. Its so much extra weight to carry around I think it would be a huge disadvantage.) I like the fact that the gap is not smaller than the (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
