|
|
 | | Re: Hi
|
| "David Koudys" <dkoudys@idirect.com> wrote in message news:G2BIK6.GB9@lugnet.com... (...) CN Please, take it *away*. I think I'm done with blockstacking. :) (...) LOL!!!!!!! Only you! ;) (...) How about "Super Pitzu-Flash 64"? (...) Rock on! Are you (...) (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Hi
|
| (...) k, that's not so bad. i think my future design will still be within a foot and a half by a foot and a half. at least in width and length. height?? not so sure about. was thinking about taking Iain's elevator 'bot and adding a few stories (a la (...) (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Next Game: Hockey
|
| Boo! My other post didn't show. I had responded to Dave Koudys' post about the blockstacking, and size limits. Anyway... In that message I had suggested the idea of hockey for our next competition. Small robots, shouldn't be larger than 20 cm^3 (...) (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Next competition
|
| hey Dave: Ok, here is my take on this. Bruce managed to put across a convincing argument about size and RCX's basically his point (and I agree) is that really, no one will show up with a 7' x 7' bot. of course this is pure speculation and NOT a (...) (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Hi
|
| (...) Well, that's the direction: The general idea was that people will unlikely build the 7 foot square bot, but they might need a few extra inches, so if we relax it, no one really would complain. But it's up for debate. (...) at (...) do (...) (...) (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
