 | | Re: R20 - Project Y - Suggested rule change.
|
|
(...) Right. But can you do it without the studded structure? (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: R20 - Project Y - Suggested rule change.
|
|
(...) I'm going through this too. I find I can build components studless reasonably well, but I can't figure out how to tie them together. I find I have to friction pin them to some studded beams and build the supporting structure that way. Derek (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: R20 - Project Y - Suggested rule change.
|
|
(...) That's kind of like saying "Have you built anything cool with an RCX?" A very small bit of building requires the controller. On the other hand, if you want to know about using the pieces, which (as you've seen) are all studless... Well, I feel (...) (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Spacin' it--old style...
|
|
So I'm going thru my webserver--cleaning things up and everything--when I come across a directory I've long since forgotten-- (URL) little background info--I made a LEGO space movie back in '84. It wen't nowhere. As a matter of fact, it went so far (...) (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: R20 - Project Y - Suggested rule change.
|
|
(...) was that smack or a back handed compliment? (...) naw. it was too forced. Try again. (...) (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: R20 - Project Y - Suggested rule change.
|
|
(...) Actually, my complaint isn't that Chris isn't a very good builder, he's just didn't think ahead. The 12" rule was posted MONTHS ago. (...) Steve sucks. Derek looks funny I have an Anti-Transfer time of 8.3 seconds. Good enough? Calum (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: R20 - Project Y - Suggested rule change.
|
|
Steve Hassenplug wrote: >> So, if I dont hear any objections... >> >> (pause) >> >> (pause) > > > > wait. > too late. > > Ok, so you're saying that the rules should be changed, because you're not a very > good builder. > YEP! thats exactly what Im (...) (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: R20 - Project Y - Suggested rule change.
|
|
(...) My question is, what is the next one going to be called? DS9 Derek (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: R20 - Project Y - Suggested rule change.
|
|
(...) wait. (...) Ok, so you're saying that the rules should be changed, because you're not a very good builder. Ok, I don't have a problem with that. It's all right with me if you change the rules. But, what's nxt? Are you going to allow robots (...) (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | R20 - Project Y - Suggested rule change.
|
|
I have this GREAT idea!!!! Instead of going with that same old silly 12" cube size rule; how about we just round up to 14" ?? ya see, I have this killough platform, and even after reducing it in all dimensions by 2 studs, its about 1.5" to wide. (...) (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
