 | | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
|
|
Calum Tsang wrote: > In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Vitali Furman wrote: > >>I have three questions. First it says that the beacon light is on when the robot >>is stopped? Does that mean the it can't be on while the robot is moving around >>or what? (...) (19 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
|
|
(...) Yes Rob building a "gun" to shoot blocks across the play area is a valid way to TRY to get blocks into another robot. In this case I think "violent" could be defined as having potential to harm a human. MORE specifialy. it could be a safe (...) (19 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
|
|
(...) To clarify, before Calum flips out, written evidence is always taken over what someone supposedly said. Just look at someone we knows phone bill or the fact my arguments at dinner were ignored when composing the rule about whether the light (...) (19 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
|
|
(...) If I want to put two interfaces beside each other, is the minimum distance between openings 16 or 12 studs? Measured from the centre line of the openings. The wall surface needs to be a uniform colour, but you don't say what colour that is. Is (...) (19 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
|
|
(...) I feel the light should be on at all times, but like Calum I feel it should be open for discussion. First of follow up Calum's points. (...) Robots don't need to be stopped to transfer a brick, personally I'm working on the principle that I'll (...) (19 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
|
|
(...) Hey - I took a 2x4 to the head due to my own stupidity in Balance of Power and while painful, do not consider such an incident as violent (so my judgement of violent may be a bit skewed). That is why I wanted to get a ruling on the definition (...) (19 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
|
|
(...) I guess it makes sence that way you know when a robot is ready to accept bricks. (...) You can try grabbing it and not letting go until brick is transfered. (But that can cause trouble with the law. ;) Vitali (19 years ago, 22-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
|
|
(...) Violently enough to hit a child in the eye standing at the edge of the table, causing a trigger happy American parent to sue a nonexistent entity. I know where you're going, I'm glad you're going there and all I'm going to say is that text was (...) (19 years ago, 22-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
|
|
(...) In my opinion (and the way it's written now) the light has to be on ONLY when the robot is stopped. It should NOT be on while the robot is moving around. Here's my reasons why: 1. No provision has been made to stop a robot remotely (ie, there (...) (19 years ago, 22-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
|
|
(...) Questioning one of the "standard" rules.... "not firing bricks violently," What is violently? -Rob A> (19 years ago, 22-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
