 | | Re: Attention guys...
|
|
(...) tray (...) No but here is an alternate way I have discovered to thaw a block of butter. First I put the butter in the microwave but the foil caught fire. (URL) I put it on top of my very warm cablemodem, and this has done the trick (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention guys...
|
|
(...) <3 pingu Iain PS - anyone know what resistor I need to put inline with say, 4 LED's in series (I think that works?), to run off the cigarette lighter in my car? I want to put blue or green LED's in the floor area of the Hawk and have 'em give (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention guys...
|
|
a> take-a-break.exe (URL) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention guys...
|
|
(...) from the owen, any chance of a photo demonstrating the mess? (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention guys...
|
|
(...) Put your "pants" back on and relax, man... it's not that no one reads your posts, it's that it's difficult to type responses while laughing that hard. Hope that helps. (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention guys...
|
|
(...) DUDE!!! eggs are bad 'cause of where they come from... think about it... THE BOTTOM OF CHICKENS!!! my god man. the BOTTOM!!! ughn Chris "It is a very clever strategy IMHO, and I applaud Chris for thinking of it." K.C. (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention guys...
|
|
(...) Dammit, because my next edition was going to be "egg sandwich". Basically you replace the fish and tartar sauce with an egg. Jessi came over and showed me how to do that a few weeks ago when we went skating. Eggs are borderline with me though (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention guys...
|
|
(...) I also hate fish! and eggs. Chris "It is a very clever strategy IMHO, and I applaud Chris for thinking of it." K.C. (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention guys...
|
|
(...) I think you need to relax and have a fish sandwich. (URL) Iain (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention guys...
|
|
(...) ARGH!!!! does no one read my POSTS!!! pant, pant, pant, pant... oh, hello Mr. Wall, Mr Desk. How are you? I know its been some time since last we spoke, but I thought we could chat ONCE AGAIN about c$ and ties. you remember. when I spoke (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Marble Sorting - Hey Dave K
|
|
(...) I have more marbles than calum. and I think Bruce LOST his marbles. Chris gee that was fun. (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention guys...
|
|
WHAT!!! you cant POST THIS!!! this is a SECRET Steve H strategy!!!!!! EVERYONE STOP READING THIS!!!! (...) -- Chris "It is a very clever strategy IMHO, and I applaud Chris for thinking of it." K.C. (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Marble Sorting - Hey Dave K
|
|
Creak creak creak (add sound of cricket here)... Boy, C$ is sure getting a lot of debate... Is there not something we can debate about with Marble? Dave A (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention guys...
|
|
(...) Right, but I can't go and deliberately say, everyone should try and be fast and rule out other ways of playing the game. Hence, we recommend three minutes or less, not we recommend you hurry the crap up because we're getting bored. I would not (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention guys...
|
|
(...) Basically: - Use a move book for the first few plays of the game, so that these are instantaeous decisions. After all, if you're using Alpha-Beta, it's much less effective at pruning earlier in the game. - Try to keep time spent 'doing (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention guys...
|
|
(...) It's recommended. We didn't want to put in a hardset rule that said "be under three minutes exactly" but we did want to discourage someone who would take 29 minutes or whatever to execute one move. Obviously you're going to have to use your (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention guys...
|
|
Steve, as much as I hate this: the rule is the rule. I personally don't want any more rule changes now. so the rule pages says 3 min. each player has up to 3 min. to move per turn. !!!!~BUT~!!!!! if two players agree ahead of time, ~!!and have the (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention guys...
|
|
(...) <rule quote> Timing ...The robot may use more or less time for any given move, however, it is recommended that the robot must complete a single move in a maximum of three minutes. </rule quote> Is there a three minute move time limit or is (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: attention Calum Tsang & Chris Magno (was Re: Starting C4 Games)
|
|
(...) YES. you are the only one. even in the rules page it says that we all know ahead of time who is first or second, and, by extension, you (the human) have enough time to do what ever is needs to make your robot work. Chris (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: attention Calum Tsang & Chris Magno (was Re: Starting C4 Games)
|
|
(...) That's what I understood when I read your message at the root of this thread (repeated here for convenience): <paste> The robot will scan the board, see that there are no chips played, play its first move and pass turn. The second robot will (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
