Subject:
|
Re: Application to exhibit (or why one shouldn't post too soon)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au
|
Date:
|
Wed, 21 Mar 2001 12:19:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
185 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, Peter White writes:
> In lugnet.loc.au, James Howse writes:
> > Dates and times
> > Fri 28sep 11-1 set up
> > Sat 29sep 9-6 exhibition (access 1hr early for exhibitors)
> > Sun 30sep 9-6 " " "
> > Mon 1oct 9-5 " " "
> Do we have enough personpower to cover this amount of time, considering two
> persons would have to be there at any one time to cover toilet breaks and
> food/drink breaks.
Studs has around 6 people? the mugs are keen maybe two of them, assume half
the Studs can't make it on a given day and a MUG is sleeping, that's still
3-4 people. The layout won't require 2 to operate (one imagines) so, we
should be right.
The biggest drains peoplewise will be setup/teardown.
> > Standard of exhibits
> > Committee will accept exhibits on merit taking into account the attaction
> > and interst provided to the viewing public. Prior to acceptance the
> > committee may wish to inspect the exhibit.
> > Layouts are to have a suitable covering below the viewing area to near floor
> > level. Exhibitors should supply screens or backdrops to their layouts and
> > dividers between adjacent stands.
> > (from Application to exhibit form: crepe paper or similar not permissible
> > under fire regs, an approved type fire extinguisher is required on each stand)
>
> I can see us going to a lot of expense and trouble setting this thing up and
> then having the application rejected.
> Backdrops ? Dividers ?
With some canny words we might get all this done for us. Assuming LA wanted
to help out this'd be the sort of stuff the could do. Otherwise I've got
access to most of this already, I'd need to call in a few favours though...
> > Non-commercial
> > payment will be made towards reimbursing the cost of travelling expences
> > etc, pending completion of a claim form issued at exhibition.
> > Q: I assume this means we won't have to pay to display, yay!
> What if the application is successful ? But I guess if they are paying to put
> the display on, they have a right to veto what goes into it.
As i said in the earlier reply to Santosh, the reimbursment is a cut from
the public entry money .
> > Insurance cover
> > non-commercial exhibits will be covered against burglary and fire damage
> > only. The policy is not an all risks cover. Exhibitors are reasponsible for
> > the supervision of their stand at all times during normal exhibition hours
> Burglary is probably the greatest risk. What security arrangements do they
> have ? The other trains would probably go first, but do you want to leave
> thousands of dollars worth of Lego somewhere for four days.
The place will be very secured, think of all the rest of the stuff there.
All one problem with security and AMRA can say goodbye to most of next
year's exhibitors. Trust me, they'll be keener than you to avoid any theft.
> > Each non-commercial stand is to display details of their exhibit (scale,
> > era, prototype and any relevant information on the layout) including the
> > name of the person, club or association in a form easily read by viewers.
> > Stand numbers will be provided by AMRA at the exhibition.
>
> Dare I ask what banner we would be standing behind ?
If necessary we can give an individual as a contact.
> > Q; do we have an era and prototype in mind?
> How about Monorail 3001 ?
'fraid I don't have any, you?
> Like Santosh I think a smaller show would be better to do first.
> We could visit the AMRA show this year just as spectators.
> James, I would be seeing who will put their hands up for what days first,
> before going to the trouble above.
> Liverpool could be hard/time consuming to get to for most people, you're
> looking at 13 hour days minimum (incl.travelling).
I agree smaller show, but we need to keep AMRA-NSW in mind. As for workers,
fair enough. Show of hands then?
> pete.w(who remembers the show I organised at W4K, and it was Pete.C and >myself, behind a Studs banner (grrr..), though others did offer creations)
James (who remembers the show too, except he had exams the following week...)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
