 | | RE: An Legal Auction Post (at last!)
|
|
If I had to guess, I'd assume they're the mini-fig pack mini-figs, otherwise if they're not lego, I'd be also wondering what they're doing there [remembering I've got no net access till I get home tonight [7:00 :( ] so can't see the item.] Benjamin (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.au)
|
| |
| | Re: An Legal Auction Post (at last!)
|
|
What has this got to do with lego? (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.au)
|
| |
| | Re: An Legal Auction Post (at last!)
|
|
Hey, How did this crap get on this newsgroup? Mark H. (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.au)
|
| |
| | Pete's off to Blighty
|
|
Hi All, Well it's less than 24 hours to go, the LEGO's hermetically sealed and locked away, the bags are nearly packed, the passports have been falsified and the Queen has been put on notice. Pete's leaving the country! Thanks to all of you for (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au)
|
| |
| | Who was after blue ninja banners?
|
|
Whoever was after blue ninja banners may want to take a look at this (if it closes before you can but noone bids, probably worth emailing the seller to make an offer). This is on ebay, but this guy has superb international trading conditions (can (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.au)
|
| |
| | An Legal Auction Post (at last!)
|
|
I currently have a Chewbacca (with base, crossbow and card), a Darth Maul(with double red light sabre) and a Darth Vader (with light sabre) up for auction on ebay. If you want to enhance your Star Wars collection, feel free to take a look. They're (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.au)
|
| |
| | Re: <<expletive indicating frustration deleted>> language
|
|
(...) used (...) There are probably a few juniors reading our posts too. Keep that in mind when you feel the need to make things more 'colourful'. Lego *is* made for kids afterall! Braith. (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.au)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: <<expletive indicating frustration deleted>> language
|
|
(...) I'd have to say that that would suit me fine. It does get a bit annoying when you hear from one side that this isn't an american-centric site, while on the other we're being forced to use language that the americans approve of, or risk as you (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.au)
|
| |
| | Re: <<expletive indicating frustration deleted>> language
|
|
"Paul Baulch" <paul@vic.bigpond.net.au> wrote in message news:FwrLIM.253@lugnet.com... (...) a (...) No, see, that's the problem. If I explain exactly what I mean, I'll be falling foul of the, how do you call them, sepos, and get my miserable (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.au)
|
