 | | Re: SourceForge Questions
|
|
(...) Assuming you're using openssh, you can look at ssh-agent. Basically, it's a process that runs in the background, that you can load your keys into (entering your passphrase once), and it will make the keys available for the ssh sessions that (...) (20 years ago, 14-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | SourceForge Questions
|
|
I have a question for all of you SourceForge gurus out there. I have a non-LEGO project (its related to work) hosted on SourceForge. I have my Sun workstation and my WinXP PC both configured to use CVS and both work without any problems. I use (...) (20 years ago, 14-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) I actually sat down and examined the way right- and left-handed scissors work and figured out how to use either style in either hand. It's visciously uncomfortable to use scissors in the wrong hand, but it can be done. (...) I've also trained (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) I was pretty much ambidexterous when I was young--wrote with both hands until my Gr. 1 or 2 teacher (can't remember which) sat me down and told me to 'pick a hand' 'cause my printing of letters would either slant to the left or to the right, (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
"Purple Dave" <purpledave@maskofdestiny.com> wrote in message news:I4CG4p.nt4@lugnet.com... (...) alone, but (...) and he (...) either (...) grab a (...) the (...) trained (...) I can only write with my left hand.. and only use a scissor with my (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | LENNI Specification v0.2 Request For Comment
|
|
Thanks so far to everyone who's participated in the LEGO Enthusiast News Network Initiative (LENNI) discussions. I've gotten a very clear idea of what types of things should be in this proposal, and have completed the draft of version 0.2, which is (...) (20 years ago, 12-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.announce, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Another LENNI Question (geek alert)
|
|
(...) I like this solution. The schema can be used not only for validation, but can be pulled to get the list of possible values. Quick question though - can't the list of allowed values be specified in the DTD, which we're going to maintain anyway? (...) (20 years ago, 11-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Another LENNI Question (geek alert)
|
|
Next techie question for LENNI… including semi-dynamic options for filters. OK, now that I've gotten a pretty good idea of what to do with the LENNI spec (which should have a v0.2 draft this weekend), the one big question that is still bugging me is (...) (20 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Starcraft Protoss MOC
|
|
(...) (URL) (20 years ago, 8-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Starcraft Protoss MOC
|
|
(...) Moses was Protoss? Awesome. I'll bet he was a High Templar. What upgrade do you need to get the "part seas" ability? Cuz there were times I coulda used that... Who says la-za-zurg, anyway? I don't see anything like it on that page we found: (...) (20 years ago, 8-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Starcraft Protoss MOC
|
|
(...) I'd be happy with SC re-released with the WC3 interface. Lots of cool functions that would have been super useful... That said, SC2 would be totally awesome. Though, having had the chance to play the Worlds of Warcraft beta this week, I can (...) (20 years ago, 8-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Starcraft Protoss MOC
|
|
(...) My Favourite-- 'Turn your head and cough!' ranking up there with 'I'm gonna drop the hammer--and dispense some indiscriminate justice!' What a game. For me, the peak of RTS. Dave K -who wishes that Blizzard would come out with an expansion, (...) (20 years ago, 8-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Starcraft Protoss MOC
|
|
(...) My personal favorite: La-za-zurg! (Sounds very close to "Damn it" in Hebrew! I think Israelites must be descendants of the Protoss :) -- Dan Boger dan@peeron.com (20 years ago, 8-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Starcraft Protoss MOC
|
|
(...) Tree-house! DaveE (20 years ago, 8-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Tanks or Power Armor
|
|
(...) As far as "the dozen or so most powerful militaries" today, it is them that have all (or most of) the ABC-weapons and mines, and the only treaties I'm awere of has been ones designed to prevent others from getting them, or scrapping outdated (...) (20 years ago, 7-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Tanks or Power Armor
|
|
(...) With a particular hostile environment like a planet uninhabitable by humans, infested with nanorobots designed to gnaw off skinn or armour (or other ABCN-weapons), or swarms of assasinationdrones, in urban theaters, think Mogadisho. I don't (...) (20 years ago, 30-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Tanks or Power Armor
|
|
(...) Well, the nations that are most likely to be able to develop hover tanks are also the nations that are most likely to be able to develop anti-HT mines. Generally, they're also the same countries that will sign arms reduction treaties. Granted, (...) (20 years ago, 30-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I hate MOCPages
|
|
(...) Or, you could use Mozilla Thunderbird for email. (URL) it free (it is opensource): (URL) (20 years ago, 4-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: I hate MOCPages
|
|
(...) Get OE-QuoteFix (or Outlook-quotefix) from (URL) Outlook (and Express) behaves like a real program... (20 years ago, 3-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: I hate MOCPages
|
|
(...) In lugnet.general, Stephen F. Roberts wrote: (...) I don't think it's only that. In my workplace, the general practice is to always include the whole text of the message to which you are responding, but to put the new content at the top. The (...) (20 years ago, 2-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
