Subject:
|
Re: Matrix Reloaded explained...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Wed, 12 Nov 2003 03:06:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
580 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Mike Petrucelli wrote:
| |
| |
Weird. Even Trekkies don’t get into Star Trek quite that much, I think...
|
|
SNIP...
| |
NASA wishes they could harness the power of anti-matter as it will be the fuel
| |
of the future (blatantly ignoring that NASA tested an anti-matter reactor and
found it genrated less useable energy than a fusion reactor.)
|
-Mike Petrucelli
|
Huh? less usable enrgy than we can harness be cause of our technology or
actually less enrgy to use (some may get instantly changed to unusable types of
energy, etc.) is there an internet article about that? I always thought it
would be safer, & more reachable goal in my lifetime to see fusion power, it
would be cool if it were just as effective as mat./anti-mat.
Jeff
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Matrix Reloaded explained...
|
| (...) Uh... Yeah Trekkies do get into Star Trek that much. I have been told all sorts of scientific "facts" by Trekkies. Such as; heat is not a form of kinetic energy, mass has nothing to do with momentum, NASA wishes they could harness the power of (...) (21 years ago, 31-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
