Subject:
|
Re: Matrix Reloaded explained...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Fri, 31 Oct 2003 00:12:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
472 times
|
| |
|
|
| |
Weird. Even Trekkies don’t get into Star Trek quite that much, I think...
|
Uh... Yeah Trekkies do get into Star Trek that much. I have been told all sorts
of scientific “facts” by Trekkies. Such as; heat is not a form of kinetic
energy, mass has nothing to do with momentum, NASA wishes they could harness the
power of anti-matter as it will be the fuel of the future (blatantly ignoring
that NASA tested an anti-matter reactor and found it genrated less useable
energy than a fusion reactor.) I loved the one where the guy said a 50 “isoton”
warhead has to be more powerful than anything from any other sci-fi, while
ignoring my corrections that “iso” is the prefix modifer for 1x. (where “kilo”
is the modifer for 1000x.) I could go on for a while.
-Mike Petrucelli
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Matrix Reloaded explained...
|
| (...) SNIP... (...) Huh? less usable enrgy than we can harness be cause of our technology or actually less enrgy to use (some may get instantly changed to unusable types of energy, etc.) is there an internet article about that? I always thought it (...) (21 years ago, 12-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Matrix Reloaded explained...
|
| (...) **snip** (...) Very nice! My problem with the whole Matrix thang isn't Keanu (though he's awful in absolutely everything he does), and I don't even really mind that the writers cobbled their little is-it-real pastiche out of a hundred other (...) (21 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
