To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.geekOpen lugnet.off-topic.geek in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Geek / 4024
4023  |  4025
Subject: 
Re: Yet another math problem
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.geek
Date: 
Mon, 11 Nov 2002 20:04:46 GMT
Viewed: 
395 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Jeff Jardine writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Dave Schuler writes:

I have five points and am trying to define the parabola that contains them
(if such exists).  The points are:

(0,0) (which is also the vertex)
(14,100)
(-14,100)
(30,180)
(-30,180)


Hmm.  Well, now that I think of it, the vertex could be x=0 with y as an
unknown.  Does that change anything?


Yes, it does.  If you just have the last four points to work with, then you
definitely have an upward-turned parabola, symmetrical about the y-axis.

Here's what you have to do to find the formula for a parabola, given three
points:

y = ax^2 + bx + c

plug in your three points:
180 = a(30)^2 + b(30) + c
180 = a(-30)^2 + b(-30) + c
100 = a(14)^2 + b(14) + c

You have three equations with three unknowns.  From the first two, you can
see that b has to be 0, so we're left with:

180 = 900a + c
100 = 196a + c

so, a = 5/44, and c = 855/11, so the vertex intercepts the y-axis at 855/11
(about 77.7)

Your solution is y = (5/44)x^2 + 855/11

Jeff J
(this time I double checked everything before clicking 'post' like a good
geek should)

Sorry, but this doesn't go through 0,0.  Solving x=0, y=0 gives 0=855/11,
which is clearly not true, so this isn't the equation he's looking for either.

Adrian
--
www.brickfrenzy.com



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Yet another math problem
 
(...) Oops. Hang on there Adrian, read for content. The five points as given in the initial problem (including 0,0) will not solve to a simple parabolic equation. Eliminating 0,0 does give us the solution specified above. Bleh. Adrian (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
  Re: Yet another math problem
 
(...) SNIP (...) Per Dave's last message, y is unknown (can't be 0), which Jeff has solved to 855/11. -Rob. (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Yet another math problem
 
(...) Yes, it does. If you just have the last four points to work with, then you definitely have an upward-turned parabola, symmetrical about the y-axis. Here's what you have to do to find the formula for a parabola, given three points: y = ax^2 + (...) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

10 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR