 | | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
(...) Some browsers (I don't remember which ones, sorry) don't respect this. It's best to combine this with the expires header, I think. :( (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
In the header of the page add: <META HTTP-EQUIV="PRAGMA" CONTENT="NO-CACHE"> This tag also keeps pages from being cached by proxy servers... (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
(...) IIRC, there is a pragma no-cache that you can add to the HTTP headers. --Todd (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
Is there a better (any other?) way to force a page not to be cached but instead fetched from the server every time, other than using the META EXPIRES tag at the top of the page. That's the only way I found and am interested to learn if there are (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: IE css help
|
|
(...) Turns out the answer is: it's a bug in IE 5.0. Seems to be fixed in 5.5. (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: where can I find VB40032.DLL?
|
|
Did you ever find the needed runtime file? It is posted at (URL) A" <s.arthur@hw.ac.uk> wrote in message news:Fxt5zz.GGp@lugnet.com... (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: "EarthLink.Net" = spam ?...
|
|
(...) Also, you might take a look at spamcop - (from memory, www.spamcop.net?). it'll analyze the headers for you, and even send mail to the right addresses to complain... I've found it quite effective. :) Dan (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: "EarthLink.Net" = spam ?...
|
|
(...) It's an old protocol, designed before people even thought about problems like this. (...) finger, probably, or the equivalent. One problem with this is that having sites give out information about the existence or nonexistence of given (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: "EarthLink.Net" = spam ?...
|
|
You're right in that the "real" sender's identity (or at least, sending location) can be traced via the headers, etc., and I know how to change my options to see all the headers/trailers/etc. I can see now how they could fake a return address and (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: "EarthLink.Net" = spam ?...
|
|
(...) Earthlink is a very popular isp -- second after AOL. (Or perhaps third after Juno; depends how you count.) So it's very likely that people pick Earthlink as a target for forged addresses. It's also common to see things purporting to come from (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | "EarthLink.Net" = spam ?...
|
|
Over the past several months, I have noticed that an increasing percentage of the spam I receive is from addresses in the "earthlink.net" domain. Has anyone else noticed this? When I forward said messages to EarthLink's postmaster, they invariably (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | IE css help
|
|
Argh. Can someone help me understand some weird Internet Explorer behavior with cascading style sheets? Check out (URL). The text there should appear approximately like this: Lorum ipsum dolor sit ament, con; venami quis nostrud laboris nisi ut (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World HTML help needed
|
|
(...) That'll work! Thanks a bunch, Dan. 'Preciate it! -Chris (24 years ago, 7-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World HTML help needed
|
|
(...) Like this? (URL) (24 years ago, 7-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Castle World HTML help needed
|
|
Hi all, I was wondering if someone could give me a little help. On the CW member pages, when I try to add to the list of creatures that member has submitted, I end up making the entire table do some rather strange things. My HTML coding isn't that (...) (24 years ago, 7-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: What's with Brickbay
|
|
(...) standardized, (...) Well, yes and no. This is a big topic, FUT to off-topic.geek. A few random points (spoken as a big XML fan who nevertheless has some reality awareness) XML itself is a standard, true, but most implementations that use it (...) (24 years ago, 7-Aug-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Here's looking at Euclid
|
|
(...) I'd say so :) Knowing that they're two verticies side by side helps! By my calculations I get: if length of a single side of the inscribed octagon is 10: Radius of the circle: 13.06562964876 Diameter of the circle: 26.13125929753 Circumference (...) (24 years ago, 3-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Here's looking at Euclid
|
|
(...) D'oh! I should have specified that the two points are vertices of a single side of the octagon; I'm sure of that much! Am I on the right track here? Assuming that the side of the inscribed octagon is 10 units long, I'm calculating the (...) (24 years ago, 2-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Here's looking at Euclid
|
|
(...) Nope... again, not unless you know something else (like how many verticies there are in between the two points). You could probably come up with a good guestimate, though, since there would only be 4 possible values for X, all of which you (...) (24 years ago, 2-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Here's looking at Euclid
|
|
(...) I have the coordinates of the points, so am I correct in thinking I can calculate X? In any case, thanks to everyone for the help; I have what I need to figure it out! Dave! (24 years ago, 2-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
