To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 8537 (-20)
  Re: It's brawl night in the kiddie pool
 
(...) I suppose it's obscure to Generation Xers, but that would be Sister Mary Elephant. I'm sure David! would have answered that, but.... Dave!'s not here. ;-) Bruce (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: new group
 
(...) Compartmentalized dork alert alert!! ROSCO (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: new group
 
(...) Compartmentalized dork alert!! :-) Maggie C. (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: ?Question for LFB?
 
(...) I was just playing around. Reingold is secure in Must Be Included status, and I've got enough US literature to read. And I'm supposed to be reviewing engineering, not history. Still: (URL) I see, is on the Joseph Henry Project. That explains (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: The Lego Beretta just won't die
 
(...) fingers (...) in (...) Due to inertia, as I said. (...) Yep, thats good advice! ROSCO (23 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: The Lego Beretta just won't die
 
(...) Nah, I'd bet it has more to do with simple Newtonian laws-- action vs. reaction. The same pistol with a shorter barrel weighs surprisingly less (and the weight distribution is different); ditto pistols vs. rifles. Given the same amount of (...) (23 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: ?Question for LFB?
 
(...) That's understandible, although technically "in America" refers to the specific cases, not the mindset--in terms of cultural ecumenes, we're firmly a European nation (albeit with more deeply- rooted creole elements). (...) I'd bet the subject (...) (23 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: End of Year Thoughts
 
(...) DOH! Just goes to show you, "Det bedste er ikke for godt" !! 8-) -H. (23 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Digital Camera?
 
(...) My attorney has advised me that I don't recall what other subjects I may or may not have had in mind re: digital photography. I just need to make sure that the lens doesn't fog up too easily. Dave! (23 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: ?Question for LFB?
 
(...) I've got a History of Science (and Technology) in America reading list, and he's not on it. (: Could be that Eurocentric paradigm along with his subject, "Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the (...) (23 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: ?Question for LFB?
 
(Objection re: placement of this noted, but I prefer to keep it semi-public, if only for my performative ego.) (...) My impression is that it's a good read, though deeply flawed. He tells a good story, but he shows the stamp of postivist (...) (23 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Digital Camera?
 
(...) Yes, but it was done ungrammatically both times. With all due respect, you're risking Fleebnorkery, sir! :D Love and rockets, Your Eighth Grade English Teacher™ (23 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: It's brawl night in the kiddie pool
 
"James Brown" <galliard@shades-of-night.com> wrote in message news:GnIzqz.CAv@lugnet.com... (...) I (...) foil. (...) ROFL!! :-) -Tim (23 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: End of Year Thoughts
 
(...) That's all right, it was an obvious typo. What should bother you is the way you spelled "occasional"! ;-) Maggie C. (23 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Digital Camera?
 
(...) I'm sorry, I can't argue until you've paid. ROSCO (payment is a truck-load of technic beams!) (23 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Digital Camera?
 
(...) No, you don't. -John (23 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Digital Camera?
 
(...) I'd like to register a COMPLAINT! Matt (23 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Digital Camera?
 
(...) giving >suggestions for cameras that photograph LEGO models well, but I should (...) No, thats WAAAAAAHHHHH (whak) Anyone else for being-hit-on-the-head lessons? Arguments is down the hall... ROSCO (23 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Digital Camera?
 
(...) WAAA...AAAH, eh? WAAA...AAAH, eh? ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head -- Mark's Lego(R) Creations (URL) (23 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Digital Camera?
 
(...) Other stuff he asks knowingly, nudge, nudge, wink, wink, say no more! Martin :-) (23 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.off-topic.fun)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR