Subject:
|
Re: Hello?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Thu, 10 Aug 2000 07:17:14 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
SSGORE@nomorespamSUPERONLINE.COM
|
Viewed:
|
418 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> > -Suz (whose drinks require a fork, and who was the groom in an elaborate TV
> > wedding (pre-Todd, of course (to see the pictures will cost ya)))
>
> Er... (ahem) "I'm not TV but I've played TV on TV" ??? (1)
>
> 1 - sorry but it just had to be said! Too good of a setup line to pass up
>
> ++Lar (Who had a friend who was "best man" in a wedding and wore a tux and
> everything, despite the fact that she was a girl)
I think I'm lost here. One of TVs above is the TV I'm already familiar
with but I'm sure there are other TVs above that I certainly don't know
and certainly not the thing similar to the TV that I have on my TV
stand.
What a sentence..:-)
Selçuk (who had a "bestman" -despite the fact that she was a girl- but
fortunately we don't have traditions like wearing tux or the like..:-)
PS. Efes Pilsen is the best beer I know..:-)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Hello?
|
| Is no one going to help Selçuk in this matter? What if I expanded the symbology to TV/TS? Or subsumed the category among the TG'ed? (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Hello?
|
| (...) Er... (ahem) "I'm not TV but I've played TV on TV" ??? (1) 1 - sorry but it just had to be said! Too good of a setup line to pass up ++Lar (Who had a friend who was "best man" in a wedding and wore a tux and everything, despite the fact that (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
