Subject:
|
Re: SPAM
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Wed, 9 Feb 2000 18:13:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
505 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, John Neal writes:
>
>
> Richard Franks wrote:
>
> > In lugnet.off-topic.fun, John Neal writes:
> > > Yes, but I attribute it to my activity on eBay, not LUGNET.
> > >
> > > Look at this lame attempt:
> > > __________________________
> > >
> > > Subject: Re:%20The%20sunshine%20house%203119
> > > Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 12:14:13 EST
> > > From: Nsname1962@aol.com
> > > To: johnneal@uswest.net
> > >
> > > everyone is talking about LS@H. Please tell me how I can order from them?
> > >
> > > ___________________________
> > > (not signed)
> > > Gee, I think I'll be a nice guy and email him back.....not.
> >
> > Why not? Because it's unsolicited or because nsname1962 is from aol?
>
> Yes.
??
I don't see how that could be spam or even a spam harvest attempt. Call me
gullible I guess, but it just strikes me as someone who's relatively clueless
at the moment, perhaps young. I get notes, from people I am convinced are
youngsters, asking the most basic questions, or asking if I want to sell stuff
for ridiculously low prices, more than once a week.
I usually try to reply.
Please elaborate on why this note is a spam note and not just from a newbie
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: SPAM
|
| (...) I see that one the same way. I get a lot of those too. I try to reply to the honest clueless questions, even though I'm easily annoyed by them. What's more annoying is when someone sends some 'official communique of the _____ empire' asking (...) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
15 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
